{"id":22757,"date":"2020-06-06T09:49:42","date_gmt":"2020-06-06T16:49:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wkoopmans.ca\/notebook\/?p=22757"},"modified":"2020-06-06T09:49:50","modified_gmt":"2020-06-06T16:49:50","slug":"lomochrome-200","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wkoopmans.ca\/notebook\/?p=22757","title":{"rendered":"Lomochrome 200"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Well I really outsmarted myself this time. I have two rolls of Lomochrome 200 which is marketed as slide film for cross processing. So I figured if I processed it in E6 chemistry rather than cross processing it in C41 I would get some neat slides. Technically they are slides I guess because they aren’t negatives but they are only slightly better than nothing which is not a positive. Here is a straight scan. There are no details in the shadows and no details in the highlights and very little in-between. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

If this top histogram represents a good exposure the bottom one represents these shots on Lomochrome 200 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

I could blame it on the film entirely but it could be the camera too. I shot it in a Lomo LCA+ that I had not used before and shouldn’t really trust. The images look underexposed which doesn’t help matters. I’ve converted a few of the images to strictly Black and White out of kindness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n