{"id":14910,"date":"2015-06-19T07:14:01","date_gmt":"2015-06-19T14:14:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wkoopmans.ca\/notebook\/?p=14910"},"modified":"2015-06-19T07:14:01","modified_gmt":"2015-06-19T14:14:01","slug":"pentax-mz-6-ektar-100","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wkoopmans.ca\/notebook\/?p=14910","title":{"rendered":"Pentax MZ-6 Ektar 100"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"MZ6_wkoopmans-3902\"<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

I discovered that the roll of Ektar 100 I had in my Contax RTS had not been exposed <\/a>but had sat ineffectually waiting for the camera to show it the light. Rather than reloading it in the Contax I put it into my Pentax MZ-6 which has not let me down.\u00a0 The result is these random snap shots that I took in the same area.\u00a0 As I’ve probably said many times here on my blog if the images I intend to capture are important to me I turn to Ektar.\u00a0 Ektar scans the best and captures the most detail with the widest exposure latitude.\u00a0 The image on the right is the same as on the left\u00a0but with -3EV exposure in Lightroom to show how much\u00a0information is still lurking in the highlights and not actually blown out as might\u00a0be with\u00a0a digital camera.
\n\"detail\"<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\nEktars\u00a0only short fall is that it is 100 ISO which doesn’t suit every situation, that being said on an upcoming post I will test it pushed to 400 ISO.<\/p>\n\n\t\t