{"id":8092,"date":"2013-03-27T07:00:14","date_gmt":"2013-03-27T14:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wkoopmans.ca\/notebook\/?p=8092"},"modified":"2013-03-26T22:36:30","modified_gmt":"2013-03-27T05:36:30","slug":"olympus-stylus-150","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/wkoopmans.ca\/notebook\/?p=8092","title":{"rendered":"Olympus Stylus 150"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Olympus_Stylus150-8846\"<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

It’s a very different proposition comparing film cameras to each other vs digital cameras because the major differences are always the lenses, focus and the exposure system the sensors (film) is the same. With digital there are many more things that differentiate cameras. Because of this it’s almost easier to speak of certain cameras as a group. The group that the Olympus stylus 150 falls into is that of the auto exposure zoom compact. This was the end of the line for film point and shoot cameras with their slow lenses requiring fast film and with the often poor results people got from camera shake at the telephoto end, it was inevitable that camera companies turned their attention fully towards digital capture. These cameras after all were what people were comparing to digital cameras when deciding which to buy at the beginning of the millennium.<\/p>\n

Other cameras in this list are: Canon z180u (2004), Nikon light touch zoom 150 ED (2002),Pentax Espio 140v (2002) Samsung Evoka 140 (?) ,Ricoh RZ3000, (1998)<\/p>\n

These last kick at the film canister cameras are destined to mostly disappear, they aren’t particularly collectible other than as a marker in camera history and they don’t produce results that stand out.<\/p>\n\n\t\t